What are the Differences Between On the Record, On Background, and Off the Record?
Navigating conversations with reporters can be tricky, especially for law firms managing sensitive cases. When engaging with the media, understanding the nuances of how information can be shared is crucial. Interviews typically are conducted in three ways: on the record, on background, and off the record. Each offers different levels of confidentiality and risk management, and knowing the distinctions between them is key to maintaining control of your narrative.
Having a team of experts, like RebuttalPR, to help navigate these conversations is always your safest bet. That being said, here is the breakdown of each term.
On the Record
This is the most common type of interaction between sources and reporters, and the default whenever to begin speaking to the reporter. When speaking on the record, everything you say can be quoted directly, attributed to you, and published without any restrictions. The journalist can use your statements to craft their story, and your name will be associated with the information you provide.
For lawyers, on the record conversations are useful when you want to make a statement or take a clear stance on an issue. For example, if you are speaking on behalf of a client or your firm and want to emphasize a legal argument or publicize a court victory, speaking on the record provides maximum transparency and publicity.
However, because there is no confidentiality in these interactions, it’s critical to prepare carefully. Once you’ve spoken on the record, your words are out there, and you can't take them back. As a result, it's wise to stick to key messages and avoid commenting on speculative matters that might be taken out of context or harm your case.
On Background
When speaking on background, a reporter can use the information you provide, but they cannot directly attribute it to you by name. Instead, they might refer to you as “a source familiar with the matter” or “a legal expert,” or include the facts you provide in their story without any attribution if they are not in dispute. This type of conversation allows you to guide a reporter’s understanding of a complex issue without being publicly named.
For law firms involved in sensitive or high-stakes litigation, on background discussions are helpful when you want to shape the narrative but maintain a degree of anonymity. You can share insights about legal strategies, explain complex legal principles, or provide context for a case without worrying about public attribution.
However, while on background provides more discretion than on the record, it is still not entirely confidential. Reporters can use the information you provide to enhance their story and may piece together clues that indirectly point back to you. It’s essential to ensure that the ground rules are clearly established with the journalist before the conversation begins, and to trust that they will honor the agreement.
Off the Record
The most private of all these interactions is off the record. In this case, nothing you say can be quoted, used, or attributed in any form. It’s essentially a confidential discussion where the reporter agrees not to make any use of the information shared, except perhaps to gather leads for further research.
Attorneys may opt for off the record conversations when they need to establish a long-term relationship with a journalist or provide sensitive background that helps explain the broader context of a case. For example, you might use off the record discussions to flag a significant development in a case or explain why a certain piece of information isn’t yet ready for public release.
However, it's crucial to note that off the record only works if both parties clearly understand and agree to the terms before the conversation begins. Some reporters may be reluctant to agree to off the record conditions because it limits their ability to report on the news. It’s also important to realize that even when a reporter agrees, they may use the information to guide their investigation, potentially uncovering the details through other means.
When to Use Each Approach
On the Record: Use this for official statements and when you want your name associated with the information. Ideal for press releases, public announcements, or promoting a legal victory.
On Background: Use this when you want to influence the story or provide clarity without being directly named. Great for sharing insights or guiding a reporter’s understanding of a complex legal issue.
Off the Record: Use this when the information is too sensitive to be publicly available, but it may help the reporter understand the situation. Ideal for delicate situations or long-term relationship building.
Media interactions can be a powerful tool in shaping public perception and ensuring your narrative is well understood. By knowing when to speak on the record, on background, or off the record, you can control the flow of information, protect your clients, and avoid potential pitfalls in the court of public opinion. Consulting with RebuttalPR can help determine the best approach for each specific situation.
Related Resources:
Why Media Training Is Crucial for Attorneys (Even Those Well-Versed in Trials)
Lessons from Disney Dropping Forced Arbitration Clause After Media Scrutiny
For further assistance and to discuss how RebuttalPR can help your firm, contact us below.